But that's actually why you're inferior
That would be a big fallacy to consider me being a convinced democrat. A free country in my understanding should have soft legislation and high level of individual and economic rights, which is possible when the power is kept by pro-west government that consists of liberal and libertarian intelligentsia and creative class. If this condition is met, non-elective power or one-party system aren't being the flaws. Quite contrary, a permanent irremovable government is vital when it protects ideals of personal freedom and individualism from assaults of inferior categories of the population who, with obtaining right to choose, are ready to immediately set oppressors on their heads that will turn the country into a big concentration camp. Democracy is good where there is the guarantee that people won't support reactionaries and barbarians anyway, but not where the people consist of them in 95%. Democracy isn't an end in itself, it should serve liberalism and libertarianism, it should be a mean that allows liberals and libertarians to stay in power as long as possible. And if in western countries it allows people to support those who bestow them freedom, in the barbaric countries it serves barbarians respectively which is unacceptable.