Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Lack of Freedom of Speech Around the World

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • writer88
    started a topic The Lack of Freedom of Speech Around the World

    The Lack of Freedom of Speech Around the World

    I've lived in Germany and the United States and have visited most of Western Europe. I have read about freedom of speech around the world, and the only countries I have found that have freedom of speech are the United States and Japan. Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and many other countries that I expected to embrace freedom of speech have certain types of non-threatening speech classified as the American equivalent of felonies (prison sentence of 1 year or more). Examples of such speech are racism, speaking against someone's religion, or generally certain types of unpopular political speech. How is this justified in your home country? How do people think it's morally okay to use violence against someone for saying something racist or politically unpopular? I would only ever be willing to use violence against for violating my person or property, as a assaulter or thief, but never for insulting me.

    Recently a British man I believe was sentenced to prison for teaching his pug to do the _________ salute.

    Source
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3gU7omIthk

    PS - I am probably wrong about a lot of countrie as I have only ever read about most of the world, and have not actually lived in these societies.

  • jordan_rudess
    replied
    I suggest temporary armistice. We are making much more important thread about EU links to fall down.

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    I wasn't talking about that saying "that wasn't the point".
    Who cares. No one understands you anyway, lol

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    No need doesn't mean beng unable.
    I'm able to scratch my ass with a toe, doesn't mean it's necessary

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Glad to learn I gave my rotten genes to your niece.
    Sounds quite pedo of you.

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    "You are just jealous", the rhetoric of the pleb and having ascendance doesn't mean you are, like, probably, every others here
    Of course I am like others here. Because French destroyed monarchy and aristocracy

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    What's the relation between egoism and correcting wrong informations ? I think it's just laziness and inability, but maybe you like avoda aravit
    Very simple. Why should I put any effort into co-creating wikipedia content. I prefer to use it for free

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Do you mean it comes from the incompetence of the royal power in place at that time ?
    Probably that was one of the issues. Louis XVI should have banned leftism and then behead them all or something.


    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    I wish you good luck to find this sentence on this topic then
    Which sentence?
    Zapisz
    Zapisz
    Zapisz
    Last edited by jordan_rudess; 06-20-2018, 10:58 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sancta_Lux
    replied
    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Why? It's always good to feel better about yourself
    I wasn't talking about that saying "that wasn't the point".

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Clara non sunt interpretanda
    No need doesn't mean beng unable.

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Lol, your maybe. You're just jealous that I'm a real aristocrat, without statistics
    Glad to learn I gave my rotten genes to your niece. "You are just jealous", the rhetoric of the pleb and having ascendance doesn't mean you are, like, probably, every others here

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Lol no, I'm egoist
    What's the relation between egoism and correcting wrong informations ? I think it's just laziness and inability, but maybe you like avoda aravit

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Two revolutions and both organized by leftists. Coincidence? I don't think so
    Do you mean it comes from the incompetence of the royal power in place at that time ?

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Of course you did
    I wish you good luck to find this sentence on this topic then


    Leave a comment:


  • jordan_rudess
    replied
    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    That wasn't the point.
    Why? It's always good to feel better about yourself

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    It doesn't prove any of your points, it's just support my view on being able to interpret any results.
    Clara non sunt interpretanda

    Lol, your maybe. You're just jealous that I'm a real aristocrat, without statistics

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Feel free to correct what's wrong then, the article would be only better.
    Lol no, I'm egoist

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    I couldn't contradict you on that.
    Two revolutions and both organized by leftists. Coincidence? I don't think so

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    I never said I agree with you

    Of course you did

    Leave a comment:


  • jordan_rudess
    replied
    Originally posted by Hades91 View Post

    Aside of the usual interpersonal polemic in this thread, where every body tries to convince others to have the bigger one. Is there a serious fact that EU and US are sliding every day more and more into totalitarian direction.

    Social engineering isn't only a theory it's practiced since decades and it works like intended. Islamic minorities with their not tolerable behavior are just a tool, to lead us into a certain direction and they do that. At the end will be willing to give up our privacy, free speech and democracy to get rid of them.
    No need to argue about that, it's obvious that I have a bigger one

    Leave a comment:


  • Sancta_Lux
    replied
    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    It wasn't. But if that makes you feel better...
    That wasn't the point.

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Only proves my point that interpretations are completely useless
    It doesn't prove any of your points, it's just support my view on being able to interpret any results.

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    I asked my 5 y.o. niece wtf are you talking about. She doesn't know
    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Wikipedia article must have been written by some angry Turk. Everyone is a crusader or a zealot to them. And there are no other definitions of crusade
    Feel free to correct what's wrong then, the article would be only better.

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Just like bolshevik revolution '1918
    I couldn't contradict you on that.

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Or maybe you
    I never said I agree with you


    Leave a comment:


  • Hades91
    replied
    Originally posted by Ameriguy99 View Post

    "Why are western countries importing those people into our countries" is the very question that will split the European Union. It's what got Trump elected, it's what got Italy's new government elected, it's what is causing the roaring revolt that is spreading across the West.
    Aside of the usual interpersonal polemic in this thread, where every body tries to convince others to have the bigger one. Is there a serious fact that EU and US are sliding every day more and more into totalitarian direction.

    Social engineering isn't only a theory it's practiced since decades and it works like intended. Islamic minorities with their not tolerable behavior are just a tool, to lead us into a certain direction and they do that. At the end we will be willing to give up our privacy, free speech and democracy to get rid of them.
    Last edited by Hades91; 06-20-2018, 12:28 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • jordan_rudess
    replied
    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    I take that as a compliment from you
    It wasn't. But if that makes you feel better...

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Another interpretation, it could be two traps as well
    Only proves my point that interpretations are completely useless

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Nah, I know this one was simple enough for a 5 years old kid to understand
    I asked my 5 y.o. niece wtf are you talking about. She doesn't know

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    No, it doesn't prove it wasn't and I invite you to check a little bit more the definitions of what is a crusade, because if it's indeed the main definition for this word, it's not the only one and I can't help if it's called crusade by Wikipedia and placed on the list of the crusades
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades
    Wikipedia article must have been written by some angry Turk. Everyone is a crusader or a zealot to them. And there are no other definitions of crusade

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    at least you got it was pure madness
    Just like bolshevik revolution '1918

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Or maybe you just didn't understnad what you agree with, uhuhuh.
    Or maybe you

    Leave a comment:


  • Sancta_Lux
    replied
    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Seems that your understanding of science is "creating useless simplifications"
    I take that as a compliment from you

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Why not two hot chicks from Brazil?
    Another interpretation, it could be two traps as well

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    I guess it needs to be. You seem to think that your associations are material reality and everyone will follow
    Nah, I know this one was simple enough for a 5 years old kid to understand

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Wikipedia says it because the Pope named it this way in his bulla, which in it own proves it was not a crusade. Crusade should begin from a Pope's call to reclaim the Holy Land, not by some bargains under the table over this or that throne.
    No, it doesn't prove it wasn't and I invite you to check a little bit more the definitions of what is a crusade, because if it's indeed the main definition for this word, it's not the only one and I can't help if it's called crusade by Wikipedia and placed on the list of the crusades
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Whatever, since you're not willing to explain what you mean
    lel.

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    I remember learning about your revolution in school. It was pure madness, phase after phase, one group taking over the power after another. Your revolution was just useless bloodshed that started destruction of European monarchies.
    Seems you weren't very focused because Revlution isn't that at all, but anyway, at least you got it was pure madness and that's not bad.

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Yes. I'd call it progress.
    Or maybe you just didn't understnad what you agree with, uhuhuh.

    Leave a comment:


  • jordan_rudess
    replied
    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Yep, with a dogma rather than science
    Seems that your understanding of science is "creating useless simplifications"

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Yep, the first 2 are bananas and the second are oranges, which give 4 fruits
    Why not two hot chicks from Brazil?

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    No need to be
    I guess it needs to be. You seem to think that your associations are material reality and everyone will follow

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    You didn't read again, you missed a word more than once. Also, while I talk about preparation, wikipedia disagrees and talk about crusade but it's ok to deny another thing
    Wikipedia says it because the Pope named it this way in his bulla, which in it own proves it was not a crusade. Crusade should begin from a Pope's call to reclaim the Holy Land, not by some bargains under the table over this or that throne.

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Yep, DEUS VUULLLT = I proved, I got that too.
    Whatever, since you're not willing to explain what you mean

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Barely knowing that there was a king beheaded and the anti monarchy was sitting on the left when going to assembly is not knowing the Revolution, it's knowing 2 small things of it.
    I remember learning about your revolution in school. It was pure madness, phase after phase, one group taking over the power after another. Your revolution was just useless bloodshed that started destruction of European monarchies.

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Glad to see you agree with me again.
    Yes. I'd call it progress.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sancta_Lux
    replied
    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Correct. Besides, I already told you how you should prove your claim in a legitimate way
    Yep, with a dogma rather than science

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    2+2=4

    Please interpret it
    Yep, the first 2 are bananas and the second are oranges, which give 4 fruits

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Yes. I'm not a psychiatrist
    No need to be

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    It was not a crusade in the normal meaning, just a war against Turkey
    You didn't read again, you missed a word more than once. Also, while I talk about preparation, wikipedia disagrees and talk about crusade but it's ok to deny another thing

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    I proved. Not my problem you don't accept proof beause it hurts you
    Yep, DEUS VUULLLT = I proved, I got that too.

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Of course I know
    Barely knowing that there was a king beheaded and the anti monarchy was sitting on the left when going to assembly is not knowing the Revolution, it's knowing 2 small things of it.

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Of course.
    Glad to see you agree with me again.

    Leave a comment:


  • jordan_rudess
    replied
    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Got it, you are unable to surpass one thing you dislike because of your prejugees.
    Correct. Besides, I already told you how you should prove your claim in a legitimate way

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Every results are matters of interpretations, no matter it's MATHEMATICS, physics or history.
    2+2=4

    Please interpret it
    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Not surprising
    Yes. I'm not a psychiatrist

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    I suggest nothing, the throne of Hungary had been supported by the pope in exchange of the preparation of a crusade
    It was not a crusade in the normal meaning, just a war against Turkey

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    You claimed* which is different but, eh, DEUS VUUUUULT
    I proved. Not my problem you don't accept proof beause it hurts you

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    As for Revolution, you still don't know how it was it seems.
    Of course I know

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Lel, it does explains everything,for sure.
    Of course.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sancta_Lux
    replied
    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    I don't read nonsense. I might as well read what's written on the package of a toiler paper
    Got it, you are unable to surpass one thing you dislike because of your prejugees.

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Interpretation? So you suggest that statistics is humanistic science like philosophy? Actually that would explain a lot
    Every results are matters of interpretations, no matter it's MATHEMATICS, physics or history.

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    God wants it.
    And? Still don't get you
    Not surprising

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Abd you suggest this was crusade. In 15th century
    I suggest nothing, the throne of Hungary had been supported by the pope in exchange of the preparation of a crusade

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    And I already showed that the Enlightenment have nothing to do with blood wanting peasants in Estates General
    You claimed* which is different but, eh, DEUS VUUUUULT
    As for Revolution, you still don't know how it was it seems.

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Extrapoling greatly from one name only. Which in fact explains everything.
    Lel, it does explains everything,for sure.


    Leave a comment:


  • jordan_rudess
    replied
    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Dixit someone who didn't read
    I don't read nonsense. I might as well read what's written on the package of a toiler paper

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Confusing the statistics with the interpretation/the read someone could have of them... This confusion can be made for everything.
    Interpretation? So you suggest that statistics is humanistic science like philosophy? Actually that would explain a lot

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Try to translate Deus Vult in english then.
    God wants it.
    And? Still don't get you


    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Ladislas III Jegellon, king of Poland and Hungary. The one getting rekt by the Ottomans
    Abd you suggest this was crusade. In 15th century

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    Not really, I already showed the ideas were way older than that.
    And I already showed that the Enlightenment have nothing to do with blood wanting peasants in Estates General

    Originally posted by Sancta_Lux View Post
    You did that alone and are extrapoling (badly) from one name only
    Extrapoling greatly from one name only. Which in fact explains everything.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sancta_Lux
    replied
    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    But who cares about the rest if it's just some thesis of a statistician
    Dixit someone who didn't read

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Not only pseudo science. Also completely useless one that distorts reality
    Confusing the statistics with the interpretation/the read someone could have of them... This confusion can be made for everything.

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Just weird associations in your weird mind lol
    Try to translate Deus Vult in english then.

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    Which Ladislas, what are you talking about?
    Ladislas III Jegellon, king of Poland and Hungary. The one getting rekt by the Ottomans

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    It proves origin of both name and the ideas. That main idea - to destroy well established order is until today the main aim of leftists
    Not really, I already showed the ideas were way older than that.

    Originally posted by jordan_rudess View Post
    It doesn't help much. As we already established, leftists originate from French Estates General, that then turned into bloody madness and festival of beheading
    You did that alone and are extrapoling (badly) from one name only

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X